I'd like to ask the evolutionists how consistently they live with their beliefs.  Think about this.  If evolution is indeed how we came to exist, why would we need hospitals or spend money trying to cure terminal illnesses?  See if you can follow my logic.

If evolution is based on the most adaptable and strongest of the species perpetuating its lineage, then there should be no desire among evolutionists to keep the weak or infirm limping along and contaminating the gene pool.  It would be better for the species to let the weak die so only the strong will continue to have children.

Yet there is something in each of us that says that is not right.  Instead, we strive for cures for those who have terminal illnesses.  We take care of the weak.  We make laws to protect people from bullies and harrassment.

Something in us screams that Hitler and his genetic experiments were an abomination against humanity.  But if an evolutionist actually believes in what evolution teaches, then they should be lobbying for getting rid of the "substandard" in much the same way as Hitler did.

This is why I see a contradiction in what an evolutionist says he believes and how he lives his life.  What they say is that there is nothing special about man other than he is the top of the evolutionary scale so far, but what they live is that mankind has a certain dignity, a quality that is more than merely a few dollars worth of chemicals.

If (macro) evolution is true, why do so many people see mankind as having some indefinable quality that causes us to value life so much and to see death as more than natural part of evolution, but something that seems wrong and unnatural?

Once again, creationism makes a more logical choice for me.